Knowledge Base
Explore our knowledge base to uncover secure, AI-driven strategies and processes to combat unauthorized immigration practices, including UAPs, UACEs, and deceptive social media content and groups.
Process and Strategies 3
Process and Strategies
-
Our process is built on a multi-stage approach designed to protect the integrity of immigration services and ensure awareness through proactive measures
-
Implement a robust automated alert system to keep the public informed about Unauthorized Professionals (UAPs) and Unauthorized Corporate Entities (UACEs) offering unauthorized immigration services.
-
3 step notice email communication
Unauthorized Practitioners and Individuals -(UAPs) 2
Unauthorized Practitioners and Individuals - (UAPs)
-
This page provides information about public profile handling for Unauthorized Immigration Professionals (UAPs) and Unauthorized Corporates/Entities (UACEs), showcasing their Level of Risk Score(1-5), Evidence on File, and Violation Tags. Users can File Complaints, Submit Evidence, and Provide Feedback about their experiences. UAPs/UACEs can request a Reconsideration of their listing. The goal is to increase transparency, protect clients, and promote accountability in immigration services
-
This content categorizes various types of unauthorized practitioners and individuals that operate illegally within immigration, education, and related services.
Unauthorized Corporate And Entities - (UACEs) 3
Unauthorized Corporate And Entities - (UACEs)
-
This content categorizes various types of corporate entities that operate illegally within immigration, education, and related services
-
In this knowledge base, we debunk the misleading claim that a Punjab Government license grants exclusive rights to practice immigration services for countries like Canada, Australia, or the UK. While the Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012
-
Unauthorized immigration consultants often misuse privacy claims to avoid revealing their licensing status, but legal frameworks in countries like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK mandate public transparency to protect clients. Each country requires consultants to be registered and maintains public registries for verification. Privacy claims cannot override these transparency requirements, as the laws prioritize client protection and prevent unqualified individuals from offering immigration advice. Consequences for unauthorized practice include hefty fines and potential imprisonment, making it essential for clients to verify consultants through official registries to ensure they are qualified and legitimate.
